Story of A Stamp: "TD" Birthday Monogram

I had a brainstorm that I would make a monogram stamp for a friend's birthday. I don't tend to be much on birthday presents, but every once in awhile, I will go for it. This anonymous friend of mine has the initials TD. His birthday is today, so I'm sure he knows who he is, but from your perspective (unless you are him) he could be anyone. TD could stand for Thomas Dolby, creator of the hit song "She Blinded Me With Science."


Of course this stamp will have nothing to do with that song, because my friend is not Thomas Dolby. And even if he was. I bet Thomas Dolby wishes people knew other things about him. Like I am sure he wrote other songs, and probably has interests outside of music. The TD whose birthday is today lives somewhat of a rural lifestyle that involves some livestock. I like his goats, which are creatures genetically walleyed.


My friend's goats are always walking around in a group on his property, eating brambles and letting out full-throated cries of, "Baaaaalinded me with science!" I copied my idea to the block and carved it:

Sometimes when I start printing, I get caught up in all of the details, and have to get the "perfect" print, which can take awhile, but usually within seven or eight tries, I get one that has the x-factor.


Happy birthday to you, TD. I will get you a physical print of this soon.


Thomas Dolby's birthday (I'm sure you are curious about it now, as I have become after writing all of this) is October 14. He is interested in boating, solar energy, and Billie Holiday, and my embedding of the following video should not be seen as an endorsement from me one way or the other about any of it.



LITERARY COUNTERPARTS—Interview With The Vampire and The Cleft

Welcome to Literary Counterparts, a book review series in which I compare two books. This month:

Interview With The Vampire by Anne Rice
The Cleft by Doris Lessing

Once in the early 1990s, I was driving past a bookstore in downtown Seattle and saw a line of hundreds of people stretching around the block. The people were all dressed in black, waiting patiently. "Wow," I said, "What is it all about?" I pointed, not that I needed to, to show my friend (I don't remember anymore who it was). Keep in mind, this was in the days before the beauty of unexpected public spectacles was destroyed by the terrible collision of corporate ad campaigns and Improv Everywhere. I did not suspect that this gathering would suddenly turn into a conga line and march magically into the rear door of a sparkling hatchback to prove the inimitable roominess and trendiness of the Honda Civic. This was just hundreds of people dressed in black standing in a line on a summer's day.

FRAMING DEVICE

This anecdote, dear reader, is an example of a "framing device." Both of my books for this month employ this literary technique.

Interview with The Vampire
The framing device here is that Louis, the titular vampire, is getting interviewed to tape by an interviewer for a radio show. The book is punctuated with returns to this scene: "The interviewer lit a cigarette and said, "Tell me more, Louis."" (that's not a real quote, but you get the idea.)

The Cleft
The framing device here is that Titus, an aging Roman senator, has been given a pile of documents relating to a very old story of the origin of humankind, called "The Cleft." Titus tells us the story as he decodes it, and occasionally breaks in with something of his own.

*

About halfway through Interview, I thought I had it all locked up, and that I knew how the framing device would conclude. I was so sure I knew what was coming that I actually wrote it out beforehand so I could be smug after:
I mean, if a vampire is narrating his life to some human, what do you think ...? Clearly, Louis will kill the interviewer and then kill himself, as he can no longer suffer his own miserable existence.
Unfortunately, that's not what happens. Steven Arntson: 0 Anne Rice: 1. After the interview finishes, and despite all of the horrors that Louis has related, the Interviewer himself (spoiler) becomes obsessed with becoming a vampire. He asks Louis to convert him and, failing that, jumps into his car to seek out another who might. It is a commentary on the very nature of the fame of these books—and given that it was Rice's first effort at a novel, it was remarkably prescient. Yes, despite the horrors and misery of being a vampire, everyone wants to be a vampire!

Doris Lessing, who in 2007 became the oldest recipient of the Nobel Prize for Literature, winds up her framing device not with a plot twist, but with a graceful fadeout. Our framing narrator, the Roman historian, has no real final goodbye other than to wonder, in a brief aside, whether or not the story he has related might be true. But all we have learned of his family, his sons, his wife, and their life—all of that fades into the shadows. It was, to me, very satisfying.

THE CONUNDRUM
There was an inverse relationship between the central conundrums of these two books. The Cleft is about the struggling beginnings of humankind; the very first people, and the moment when our sort of creature suddenly started producing males (at first it's just females). The book always returns to this central question: "How do we keep from going extinct?" People die all the time in the book, from many causes—animals, storms, accidents, etc. There is a folksong in the book that's frequently quoted: "How few we are; how easily we die." It is rough to be the first humans, with barely any of you in existence and also the difficulties inherent in reproduction.

In Interview, the central characters are faced with the opposite situation: they can't die. They have to learn to endure endless existence. It's suggested in the book that the leading cause of death among vampires is suicide.

Both of these conundrums seem true. The human race itself is not in a "how few we are, how easily we die" kind of situation at present. Humanity itself seems a little more vampiric, consigned to continue, if not forever, then for quite awhile. We're somewhat doomed as a race to immortality, and must struggle to make good decisions, keeping things interesting without ruining everything. As an individual human, however, I feel a little more of the Cleft scenario, at least as regards my brief turn on this globe. Verging on forty now, I realize at a gut level that something will get me one of these days. It goes against my wishes, and I have written a few folk songs about it, let me tell you!

END FRAME
To return to the mysterious line of black-dressed people (as I must for this to truly be a framing device) in the early 1990s: "What is it all about?" you will recall I had just exclaimed to my Sadly-Now-Forgotten Friend (hereafter, 'SNiFF").

"That's the bookstore," said SNiFF. "Anne Rice is reading there tonight."

There was in SNiFF's voice a hint of disapproval that effortlessly and permanently cemented in me a dislike of Anne Rice that persisted for decades after, during which time I felt not the slightest curiosity about her or her work. That's a bit of a fault in me I've been trying to improve—I tend to be judgmental of popular art, as if I'm surely above the taste of the crowd. This attitude has never helped me in the least, and for a long while I've been trying to sand it down. So the other week when I saw Interview at the thrift store, I picked it up.

Now I have read it, and would like to report that Rice seems to come out against the idea of vampires wearing black. At one point in the book, Louis talks of the "conformist club" of black-wearing French vampires. That aside, though, the book seems a good example of gothic themes, and certainly has that gothic surface quality of sex and violence put in the blender together on "liquefy." It featured many scenes of unbridled sexviolence, followed occasionally by whatever comes of such passion after the bridle has been off awhile and you're looking to take it up one more notch.

Also, at one point, there was this: "And the head, blood coursing from the torn neck, the eyes staring wild under the flaming rafters, the dark silky hair matted and wet with blood, fell at my feet. I struck it hard with my boot, I sent it flying along the passage."

I have some soccer fan readers who always ask me if there is any soccer, so I thought I'd mention that.

Thank you for reading Literary Counterparts, and I will see you again next month!


LITERARY COUNTERPARTS: le Carré and Le Guin

Welcome to LITERARY COUNTERPARTS, a book review series in which I compare two books. This month:

•Ursula K. Le Guin—The Other Wind
•John le CarrĂ©—The Spy Who Came In From the Cold 

Topics:
•Caught between a Rock and a Hard Place
•The Larger Implications
•The Even Larger Implications

Disclaimer: I didn't choose these novels because the last names of both authors begin with "Le." I didn't even notice that until just now.


CAUGHT BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE

The Spy Who Came In From The Cold is a spy novel starring a spy I came to think of as "Poor Leamas." Poor Leamas is caught between a rock and a hard place from page one. The rock is the British Intelligence Agency, and the hard place is the Russian/East Berlin Intelligence Agency. Poor Leamas is asked by the Brits to pretend to defect to the Russians so he can smear the reputation of a pesky Russian spy. It's a very hard place, and this is a very serious book whose seriousness walks straight into melodrama. Nonetheless, it effectively depicts the slow crush of a man who is stuck between these hard places. If you are familiar with Mohs Scale of Mineral Hardness, which is used to measure the relative hardnesses of minerals, let's say that Poor Leamas is stuck between a rock of hardness 4 (fluorite) and a "hard place" that is also hardness four. But Poor Leamas has only hardness 3 (calcite).

The Other Wind deals with a larger frame than the individual, focusing on the difficult international situation in the fantasy realm of Earthsea, the setting of several books Le Guin wrote between 1963 and 2001. In Earthsea, dragons and people used to be the same kind of creatures—but dragons went west, and humans went east to found the Kargaad Empire. Inbetween West and East some humans got stuck and created their own in-between culture. However, being between the Dragons and the Kargaad Empire would one day be the equivalent of being between a Rock of Mohs hardness 6 (Feldspar) and a Hard Place of an equivalent approximate Mohs hardness.


THE LARGER IMPLICATIONS

In ...In from the Cold, Poor Leamas is hired by his UK spy boss to enact PLAN A against the Soviets. But Plan A turns out to be a disaster, and you wonder what's going to happen to Poor Leamas. However it turns out that the "Plan A Disaster" was (spoiler) planned all along, and that Poor Leamas was an unwitting pawn in a larger operation: PLAN B. Discovering this does not get Poor Leamas out from between the earlier-mentioned rock and hard place, but it is a satisfying moment in the book where you realize that everyone has been betrayed.

I was in a suspicious, paranoid mood after finishing ...In from the Cold. Not only are people not who they seem to be, but their real motivations are cloaked even deeper. Everyone has both agenda and counteragenda like a puppetmaster manipulating a marionette who is in turn manipulating a sub-marionette.

I started wondering, as a good spy should, about the motivations at work in the writing of ...In from the Cold. Just who was this "John le Carre´" and what were his aims in writing such a bleak, airless novel? I shortly learned that "John le Carre´" is the false identity of a man named David Cornwell. Cornwell was, for years, in the British secret service section known as MI5. He's the third writer I've known to be in this group. The other two are children's writer Roald Dahl and spy writer Ian Fleming (inventor of James Bond).

Awhile back my wife read a book about Roald Dahl in which it was mentioned that Dahl and Fleming were propagandists for British intelligence during their own involvement with MI5, producing writing geared to increase public approval of British espionage. I don't think James and the Giant Peach was among these, but other stuff. Clearly, James Bond fits.

I was puzzled about le Carre´, though, precisely because ...In from the Cold makes the secret service out to be such a scummy enterprise, the British Intelligence Agency essentially responsible for murdering a Jewish communist so they can protect a murderous anti-Semitic communist secret agent who has gone over to the British side. Poor Leamas and his girlfriend end up as collateral damage in accomplishing this, and the book employs an extended "Rock and a Hard Place" metaphor: a bunch of kids getting crushed between two big trucks. The trucks are the two ideologies—Russian Communism and British Democracy—and espionage is the bloody mess of innocents between (of Mohs hardness 1—talc).
Then I remembered a quote from near the end of the book, one of Poor Leamas' last speeches. The "they" here are the heartless, amoral espionage networks of the two countries.
"They don't proselytize; they don't stand in pulpits or on party platforms and tell us to fight for peace or for God or whatever it is. They're poor sods who try to keep the preachers from blowing each other sky high."
Now, I don't know if this book was supposed to be propaganda. If it is, it's pretty sophisticated—but I think there's an argument to be made that a book like ...In from the Cold does have the effect of elevating espionage to the position of "necessary pressure release valve to the unbending ideology of the State (Mohs hardness 8—topaz)."


THE EVEN LARGER IMPLICATIONS OF THIS


When I was a kid, maybe eleven years old, I realized something about action movies—that everything hinges on the universal human fear of death. If people weren't afraid of dying, then every plot of every action movie ever made would fall apart.

Last year I read an essay by George Orwell in which he maintained that the greatest threat to modern human civilization was the decline in the belief in the immortal soul. That observation stuck with me—that we've become neurotically actuated by a desperation to avoid death.

Le Guin treated this issue in one of her Earthsea books that I read awhile back—The Farthest Shore. The Other Wind proves a continuation of this theme. In the novel, sorcery has created a kind of false afterlife in which people wander around in an unappealing city surrounded by a fence. This is the rock and hard place of the humans who find themselves living between the Western Dragons and the Eastern Kargaad Empire.

Also, it is considerably more horrific than ...In From the Cold, because we're not dealing with our puny mortal existence, but with our sprawling, eternal afterlife. Here we have a thriller novel whose suspense element isn't limited to life only, but includes the ever after.

Once I'd read these two books, I was starting to feel that I, as a reader, was stuck between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, I pressed against the possible cultural manipulations of ...In from the Cold, which caused me suspect questionable authorial motives, and that apparent themes are just a Plan A intended to go awry and lead me straight into the Plan B of accepting the necessity of all of the shitty things we do to one another. On the other hand, Other Wind suggested that the ultimate theme of death itself should be accepted as a way to mitigate the very desperation that causes our inhumanity in the first place.

The pressures grew greater, until I began to suspect that I was caught between a rock of hardness 10 (diamond) and a hard place of equal hardness (10—another diamond!).

 There are only two things that can happen when a person is thus caught. If the rock of hardness 10 comes together perfectly parallel with the hard place of hardness 10, you are crushed. But if they should come together in a way that is not perfect—if there is some irregularity—you might just get squeezed right out from between them like a grape seed sliding between a pair of teeth (which are ~5 on the Moh's hardness scale). For instance, if one of the books is essentially a cheesy spy novel, maybe it will slide off to one side. And if the other is a slightly boring rumination that's less compelling that some of the books that preceded it in the same series, it might slide off a little to the other side. And—fwip!—out you will spring, a little grape seed so soft you cannot even be rated by Moh. And you have survived because of it.

*
Thanks for reading LITERARY COUNTERPARTS. These two books have received the official Literary Counterparts stamp, and will now be returned to their native thriftstore habitat.


Story of a Stamp: The Sam Boshnack Quintet

I was asked to design a stamp for the Sam Boshnack Quintet. "Quintet," I thought to myself. "Five sides. Five ... pentagon." Pentagon would be my idea.

PENTAGON!


I really had to jostle the instruments into that pentagon. Especially the piano. Not only are pianos bulky in real life, but they are representationally bulky.

I listened to some of Sam Boshnack's music while I worked on this. When I can, I listen to the music of the group I'm making a stamp for, which is why I only make stamps for groups whose music I like. Sam is the composer for the Seattle combo Reptet. I recommend their most recent album, At The Cabin. The group I'm arting for here, Sam Boshnack Quintet, has a new homepage on Sam's new website here.

Trace, carve, print:



There's a confession I have to make. Stamps are all about "positive space" and "negative space." That's not very much to think about, but sometimes I get them mixed up. This happened as I was carving the word "SAM," with the following result:
For awhile I tried to convince myself that that line around "SAM" was cool looking. But it just isn't, so I doctored it with a paint brush.


That is a good lesson about positive space and negative space. You've always got to be thinking about that. Even now, whatever you're doing.

Sam asked if I could separate the pentagons and print them in red. At the time I did that, my wife was changing out the stem on her bike, so the multipurpose nature of this room is nicely captured!





The Wrap-Up List is Published!

My second young adult novel, The Wrap-Up List, is finally published, and I read from it here in Seattle at the inimitable Elliott Bay Book Company.

I'd like to thank Elliott Bay for hosting the event, and each and every person who came out, especially those who asked questions during the Q&A afterwards. My wife kindly filmed some of that. Here's a few of the excellent questions and my attempted answers.



I probably don't need to mention this, given the title of this post, but you can buy the book now, if you'd like, or check it out from your local library. It's available most places as either a hardcover or for the ereader of your choice. Thanks for being interested!